Shannon's profileVisitorInvasionPhotosBlogListsMore ![]() | Help |
|
September 22 VI offering competitive sales commissionsGreat news!
VisitorInvasion.com members now earn competitive commissions on all direct sales.
Wow! Great advertising with free options and commissions simply for helping promote the site.
Wondering how that works?
Simple. While promoting your business, simply add one of the affiliate codes provided in the Referral section of your VI account. Any sales made by you will be credited to your VI account and may be requested at a minimum of $10 via PayPal or AlertPay.
Members can log in here: VI Login
New advertisers may sign up free here: VI Signup
June 16 Ed & Elaine Browne have a fighting chanceEd & Elaine Browne have been held hostage in their own homes by federal agents due to their refusal to be taken into custody for failure to comply with a law that no official involved could show them. Yes, I'm talking about federal income taxes. Here's the latest scoop. Attorney General, Paul Andrew Mitchell, so ordered on June 15, 2007, that "The alleged 'liability' was fabricated by the Internal Revenue Service, but there is no corresponding Act of Congress creating that specific liability for any income taxes imposed by IRC subtitle A." What the heck does that mean, you ask? Read the cease and desist order here. August 09 Rhetoric on the Two-tier Internet SchemeRhetoric on the Two-tier Internet Scheme
by Shannon Whitehead
Internet Service Providers (ISPs) in the United States support the “two-tier” internet system. Currently, the internet is one huge network that anyone who has a connection can access or upload content, making it a “one-tier” internet system. All data runs through the same “pipes” (conductors) from the originating point of the data right into homes, businesses, and educational centers world wide. Recently, these pipes have been upgraded from copper conductors to fiber optic conductors to improve the speed that information travels online as well as the quality of fast-loading graphics and videos. This service is known as the “broadband” connection through which cable and DSL (digital subscriber line) services are provided. The investment into the upgrading of these pipes is the act that originated the proposal of the two-tier internet system. When this system is imposed, it will create a dual-level internet that will separate commerce-based web content from non-commerce-based web content. Commerce and information-based websites will have to pay to upload their content to each ISP individually in order to be accessible by all internet connections. Although the telecommunications industry disagrees, this new system has an infinite amount of drawbacks. Though the two-tier internet is predicted to be a good thing by the ISPs, it will in fact be the downfall of the internet system as a whole because it will force many internet marketers offline while narrowing options for online consumers, raise costs for those who upload data to the web while inadvertently costing consumers more due to inevitable membership fees that currently free websites will be forced to charge and ultimately lead to censorship and controlled communication.
Though the two-tier system is disguised by the telecommunications companies as a way to “repair” the “broken” internet system by allowing major online conglomerates to pay for preferential email delivery and other services, the new system is going to change the internet for the worse and affect millions of lives (Olowski). Suppose that Joannie, a young single mother who can barely make ends meet, finds a second income online as a bulk e-mail marketer. Imagine that Joannie offers her services of spam-free bulk e-mailing of the clients’ ads to her database of 20,000 opt-in e-mail recipients for $29.95 per mailing on the present internet system. According to Jason Miller, writer for WebProNews.com, the cost of the new preferential e-mailing service through the two-tier internet system is going to require bulk e-mail marketers to pay up to $0.01 per e-mail sent (Miller). Thus, the new system will potentially cost Joannie $200.00 for one mass e-mail for one client. Joannie’s business will go under quickly even if she does raise fees to make up for overhead costs. Left no other choice, Joannie goes to the nearest strip-joint to earn money to take care of her seven children. This new line of work drives Joannie to drinking heavily, which naturally inhibits her ability to be aware of her surroundings. She unwittingly leaves her drink on the table where she was sitting entertaining a customer, returns to the table, finishing her drink not knowing that the customer had drugged the drink. Joannie does not realize right away that the odd sensation she is feeling is not due to the alcohol, but to the drug the customer had put in her drink in hopes that being unable to drive, Joannie would ask him to drive her home. Joannie continues to drink and dance until she collapses to the floor, unconscious. The manager assumes that Joannie is only drunk and has the bouncer carry her to the dressing room to sleep it off. Come closing time, one of the other entertainers tries to awaken Joannie only to realize that she is dead. Seven children have been orphaned due to the greed of the telecommunications companies. In addition to this tragedy, Joannie’s online clients have lost their choice in bulk e-mailing companies. Unfortunately, Joannie’s clients are not the only web users who are about to lose their choices in what they browse or buy online. Millions of internet browsers may soon be limited as to what sites they are able to view from their paid web connection. If content providers are going to be forced to pay each ISP fees to be allowed web traffic from each ISP’s customers, it is safe to say that this will limit internet consumers’ options on what they may shop for while browsing from their connections. According to William Tinning, even the inventor of the internet, Sir Tim Berners-Lee, is against the imposition of the two-tier internet system, “A two-tier system would mean people would have full access only to those portions of the Web for which they paid (Tinning).” Imagine for a moment that the two-tier internet scheme has already been imposed. Suppose that a woman named “Francis” loves to make crafts and sell them at the local flea market. For several years she has been browsing the internet for affordable supplies with which to make her crafts. Unfortunately for Francis, the specialty websites from which she does most of her purchasing of supplies are all using different servers than those Francis’ ISPs allow their customers to browse, and she no longer can access the supplies she needs online. This situation not only hurts Francis’ ability to earn income, it hurts the web stores that she, and presumably many others, may no longer shop. Not only is this situation against the rights of the American consumer to shop where they please, it is against the rights of those with information to share to get that information seen. Changing to the two-tier internet system is going to cost information providers an extra undetermined fee to upload content and have it seen on each ISP available. Kieron O’Brien, CEO of PacketExchange.com, states, “When you look closely at the private Internet solutions top level ISPs and content providers use to bypass delays in content delivery to end users, a two tier Internet is very much a commercial reality – indeed a ‘business class‘ Internet for the future is very much the way things are going (PacketExchange.com).” This is the corporation’s way of “snow-balling” the public into believing that the two-tier internet is not about the greed of some of the major telecommunications industries around the world. As it stands now, anyone with an internet connection and uploading capabilities is able to add content of almost any kind to the internet from anywhere in the world, making it accessible to anyone in the world that also has an internet connection. Imagine that Google pays AT&T for their internet connection. Imagine that America Online (AOL) will not allow their internet customers access to Google because Google does not have a contract agreement to pay AOL “x” amount of dollars to allow Google traffic on AOL pipes. There are several solutions to this problem. Google could, in fact, end up paying every ISP known to mankind—a separate monthly fee to each ISP globally in addition to AT&T’s connection fee--in order to reach every internet user on the planet. Internet customers could theoretically pay hundreds, if not thousands, of dollars per month to each telecom for individual connection fees in order to ensure they have access to all their favorite websites and information sources. Or, suppose that AT&T, AOL, and Verizon suddenly realize that their proposal of the two-tier internet plan will cause more harm than good in the long run and decide that the investment they made into fiber optic pipes will eventually pay for itself over time with increased numbers in broadband customers throughout the world. If the latter does not occur, the two-tier internet plan could potentially end up costing consumers membership fees to use Google and other currently free-to-use websites. According to Alexa.com, there are 4.5 billion ranked websites currently online. Imagine the percentage of those 4.5 billion websites that are available to anyone with a connection at no charge. Anyone can access E-bay, Google, Yahoo, or MSN, among countless others, at anytime they choose. Theoretically, any or all presently free-to-use websites may be forced to charge their users a monthly membership fee in order to make up the fees charged by the ISPs just to make their sites available to all their users. Assume that a “Jared” is a student working his way through college. With a full-time job that barely covers his tuition, books, rent, and food, Jared has little spare time and must rely heavily on the internet to serve any research needs he may have for his classes. Jared has grown accustomed to using several different search engines to locate resources for his assignments. Under the two-tier internet system, the search engines, which have always been free-to-use, relying only on advertisers for income, now must charge users a monthly membership fee in order to afford to make their data available. Jared, who has managed to remain on the Dean’s List at his college for 7 consecutive semesters, now has to slack somewhat on his homework in order to pick up over-time hours at work so that he can pay the monthly fees to several search engines because the use of only one search engine limits his ability to research all possible aspects of his assignments. Unfortunately, Jared’s grades have suffered, knocking him off the Dean’s List during his final semester, thus destroying his chances of gaining scholarship funding for medical school. As one can plainly see, the two-tier internet plan gives the ISPs total control over what their customers are allowed to view, which is a form of censorship. The new system will provide the perfect means for the telecommunications companies to begin the practice of censoring information that their clients can access. The definition of censorship is “the act or process of deleting or hiding information (Webster, 115).” ISPs are presenting this practice under the guise that “the two-tier internet system is … necessary in order for the ISPs to exercise their right to capitalize on their investment into the new and improved fiber pipes (Whitacre, Oates)”. One could muse that this statement is a lame way of justifying online censorship. One could further suggest that the ISPs’ investments into the new broadband services will earn its return over time through fees earned by selling the broadband connection. Most businesses earn a profit on their invested funds through the sale of their product or service rather than create new ways to charge for that same service in order to gain total control over who can provide what goods, services or information to whom. Suppose CNN has a story that is not in the best interest of AOL for their customers to see. AOL cannot stop that story from making it to television and radio, but under the two-tier internet scheme, AOL would have the power to fabricate a reason to discontinue CNN’s service on their pipes in hopes of this information not finding its way to a good percentage of AOL’s customers. Eventually, the act of censorship will lead to limited to impossible communication among groups or individuals. The two-tier internet system, by giving total control to the ISPs, stands to hinder communication between people all over the world. Under the internet system currently in use, anyone anywhere in the world can communicate with whomever they choose on any ISP via chartrooms, instant messenger and conferencing software. It is common knowledge that chat rooms are monitored due to online solicitation of minors, and that is fine, but with the ISPs becoming enabled to total control, it is possible that instant messages and online conference room conversations will be monitored and controlled as well. Many relationships are held together online, both business and personal. Often the internet is the sole means of communication for online businesses. Assume that “Jack,” “Pierre,” and “Juan” are business partners from different parts of the world and communicate only via e-mail and conference software. All three men are connected to the internet through a different ISP. Under the new internet system, Juan’s ISP does not carry the conference software their company uses, or the e-mail service that Jack uses. This predicament leads to hefty overseas phone bills for the business partners and eventually causes them to terminate their long-time partnership. This is just assuming that the controlled communication will remain innocent. There is nothing barring the ISPs from choosing to allow or disallow communication with their customers for their own reasons. In short, the two-tier internet system is a controversial topic everywhere right now. Internet marketers are deeply frustrated with the ISPs for proposing the two-tier internet plan as well as the House of Representatives for voting to support it. “Their numbers are large and they will work diligently toward yet another [government] regulation knowing that governments just love to prevent the small business owner from profiting,” says Gina Weiss of NetMarketingForum.com. Students are worried that the cost of education will skyrocket under the new plan. They have a right to be worried, as the era of free information is soon to be over. Global communications will become increasingly difficult and expensive on top of the censorship internet users are sure to endure. But, the ISPs stand to make a bundle, and that is what is most important concerning the way the internet is conducted. The rest of the world should be ashamed to begrudge the CEOs of the ISPs their extra millions of dollars in profit that they seem to need so desperately. Citations: Alexa.com. “History, 2004.” Alexa.com. 31 July, 2004. Alexa.com. 19 July, 2006. <http://www.alexa.com/site/company/history> Miller, Jason. “No Good Mail for Gmail.” WebProNews.com. 20 Apr., 2006. WebProNews.com. 19 July, 2006. <http://www.webpronews.com/topnews/topnews/wpn-60-20060420NoGoodmailForGmail.html#Google> Oates, John. “Vint Cerf Condemns Two-Tier Internet: ‘Dumb Idea is Dumb,’ says man.” TheRegister. 08 Feb. 2006. TheRegister. 25 June 2006. <http://www.theregister.co.uk/2006/02/08/cerf_calls_for_neutral_net/> Olowski, Andrew. “How ‘Saving the Net’ May Kill It.” TheRegister. 17 July, 2006. TheRegister. 19 July, 2006. <http://www.theregister.co.uk/2006/07/17/net_neut_slow_death/> PacketExchange.com. “Two Tier Internet Debate Confuses Service Delivery Issues with Inherent System Performance Limitations, Says PacketExchange.” PacketExchange.com. 15 Mar. 2006. PacketExchange.com. 19 July, 2006. <http://www.packetexchange.net/content/2006-03-15-1.htm> Tinning, William. “Internet Pioneer Warns of Two-Tier Web.” The Herald. 26 May, 2006. TechNewsWorld.com. 19 July, 2006. <http://www.technewsworld.com/story/50712.html> Webster, Noah. “Censorship.” The New Webster’s Concise Dictionary. Copyright 2003, Typhoon International Corp. The New Webster’s Concise Dictionary. 19 July, 2006. Weiss, Gina. “How to Protest AOL’s Two-Tier Internet.” NetMarketingForum.com. 14 Mar. 2006. NetMarketingForum.com. 19 July, 2006. ----------------------------------
Please feel free to leave a link with any comments you may have.
April 20 Aol users need to switch to Gmail ...Here is an excerpt article i received in my email today. AOL users need to tell AOL to shove it. Use it to connect then move on! Show them what you think of their little GoodMail...
No GoodMail for Gmail
Leaving AOL further out on a limb holding its Goodmail playbook, Google said it will not be instituting a payment system to ensure email delivery to Gmail users. The power of email filtering, said the company, should rest in the hands of its users. Editor's Note: Is it getting too hot for AOL? Is it time for them to scrap their Goodmail partnership? Or is true net-neutrality and open access a fantasy of the Internet socialist? Discuss in WebProWorld. Until now, Google had been very quiet about AOL's controversial plan to implement Goodmail's CertifiedEmail system, one that would require approved bulk mailers to pay a small fee per email in order to ensure delivery to member inboxes. After Yahoo! made a separate announcement about the use of Goodmail, many had feared a domino effect in the industry that would cost bulk mailers millions of dollars per year. The fear that Google would follow suit stemmed largely from the presence of Google Vice President Jonathan Rosenberg on Goodmail's list of strategic advisors. But in a statement to WebProNews, Google Corporate Communications' Eileen Rodriguez said there were no plans to implement any such payment process. "Gmail does not accept payment to bypass its filters, nor are there plans to charge senders to reach Gmail users," said Rodriguez. Adam Green of MoveOn.org, one AOL's harshest critics, believes Gmail's announcement to be illustrative of email service providers (ESP) increasing reluctance to be lumped in with the AOL pay-to-send scheme. "AOL is increasingly looking like the black sheep of the industry as respected titans like Google distance themselves and state for the record that they will not follow AOL's lead into a world where the big guys can pay to bypass spam filters," said Green. "Today, Google set the dominoes in motion as AOL becomes a completely isolated and tainted actor in the industry."
Indeed it does appear that way, as even Yahoo! Postmaster Miles Libby has been very pointed in delineating the difference between AOL's and Yahoo!'s arrangement with Goodmail. Libby in DM News: "The first major difference is that we are designating it for transactional e-mails only. This avoids a lot of the, 'All e-mails need to be spam' kind of concerns." Rodriguez gave the impression that Gmail's current spam detection system was an adequate defense for its users. "Gmail has a superior spam detection system that gives users ultimate control over the messages that are filtered into their spam folders," she said. The concept that inboxes should be more user-controlled as a part of larger net-neutrality argument is echoed by David Hughes, chief executive officer of Reflexion Network Solutions, a Massachusetts-based anti-spam solutions provider. "I'm glad to hear them say that (referring to giving users ultimate control)," he said. "Email is a very personal thing. (AOL) should have understood this very personal, democratic, egalitarian aspect. And I think that's where they blew it. Power should be in the hands of users." But proponents of the proposed Goodmail implementation call the free and open access philosophy (to which Google seems to ascribe) naïve. Esther Dyson, editor of Release 1.0 for CNet Networks thinks a world without Goodmail is unrealistic: "It's idealistic and unrealistic in a world where there are bad people; you need to spend money to protect yourself. At the moment, the costs have to be borne by the recipient. Really you want to charge through third parties [such as Goodmail] who can work together with ISP," said Dyson. "People who are anti-Goodmail say, 'Let's have an intelligent design for anti-spam systems'," she says. "I believe in evolution: there will be a lot of different attempts, and some will work and some won't, and the best will thrive." Read the Full Article
April 06 Take a friggin break and turn on the radio...Long time no postie...
March was a long month and I, for one, am certainly glad it's over.
It's starting to warm up in Indiana--FINALLY--and everyone thinks I need to be doing something other than sitting here working. Today not much work has gotten done at all, at least not online anyway.
Today started with errand running and bill paying, then homeschooling mixed with household chores. Then low and behold, right after I checked on my sites something strange happened. I remembered I have a fondness for music.
How about that?
Constantly using music trivia in one of my programs yet have
so much going on in the office, I don't want to take up precious
CPUs running music as well. All plug-ins are full with the necessary plug-ends, no room for a stereo in here anyway.
Got 4 speakers & a woofer hooked up to this thing and I can't
take time to hear some tunes--plus my stepson is trying to work in here as well, although he swears he learns better while jamming....
Anyway, the only sounds I hear while working are the audio that
goes with certain websites. The ones with music are becoming a fondness of mine.
Doing a lot of thinking about music today...different kinds of music, certain lyrics, my favorite drum riffs in certain songs, the stereotyping and contradictions of society's "norms" and actions...just a lot about music.
Remember when we were little kids and those boys committed suicide while listening to Judas Priest? Not a big Judas Priest fan myself, but my folks listened to it then and I am sure they still enjoy it now. Guess what? They never attempted suicide.
Imagine that.
You know how society has given the gays hell for years? Trying to keep talented people out of sports, military and who knows what else based on their orientation and all that while all the while "We Will Rock You (We are the Champions)" is every bit
as popular as our National Anthem from Pro to Junior High sporting events all across the U.S. and has been ever since I can
remember. What sense does that make?
Music has been and always will be controversial.
If you aren't used to it yet, get used to it. Like it or not, it's here
to stay. Like rap? Too bad. Here to stay. Like rock? Tough noogies. Been here longer than I have and kids are still rockin
to Black Sabbath. Like country? Get over it! It's the only thing comin' in on the car radio on a rainy day. I could go on all day
about these things.
Eminem is an enormous controversy.
Vulgar? Um, yeah. Goes without saying.
Should he be banned from radio airwaves? Um, yeah. Radio cannot be parentally blocked as, cable, satellite and internet.
Should parents be paying attention to what their kids listen to
even though it could possibly bring on a migraine? Um, YEAH!
Should Marshall aka Slim Shady be censored?
Um, NO! Why? Because it's our right in this country to love it, hate it or be indifferent to it. Because the responsibility lies on
parents individually not society as a whole. Because, like it or not, even the crudest and rudest have the same inalienable right to free speech. Take away that right for one and lose it for all.
Tobey Keith won't be puttin a boot in anybody's ass if that happens. That is one right we should all be fighting to keep, putting personal opinions aside.
Is there a point to all this?
Not really, just getting some thoughts down and putting in a more recent entry. I left a lot open up there to be stomped on
or agreed with. Don't forget to leave your link of choice with your comment. Feel free to add the RSS feed to your own pages
for more content.
What?! You don't have a site?! Get one now!! click me March 07 The Rise and Rise of Article PR...The Rise and Rise of Article PR: What are the Implications?
By Glenn Murray | SEO Copywriter & Article PR Specialist *
Already a very popular method of achieving a high search engine ranking, article PR (aka article submission) has now entered the mainstream. As such, its popularity is increasing at a dramatic rate. While this is great for SEO copywriters like myself, there are some side-effects that need to be addressed if article PR is going to remain a viable search engine ranking technique. This article discusses some of those side-effects, along with how they might be addressed.
But First, a Little on Article PR Article PR is the process of writing 'frëe reprint articles' and submitting them to the 250+ established article submission sites on the Internet. An article submission site is simply a repository of frëe reprint articles - a place where authors can submit their articles frëe of charge, and where webmasters can find articles to use on their websites frëe of charge. In return for frëe use of your article, the webmaster includes your author bio and its links to your site. Every time your article is published, you get another link to your site and a boost to your ranking. If the quality of your article is high, it can be published hundreds of times. The Rise And Rise of Article PR Because article PR is such an effective way of generating a high search engine ranking, it has now entered the mainstream. As an SEO copywriter, I get several requests each week for quotes to write articles. These requests come almost exclusively from business owners and marketing managers who know little (if anything) about SEO. They obviously didn't go looking for article PR; article PR found them... As a result of its newfound mainstream popularity, the number of articles being written and submitted has increased by between 100% - 600% in the past year! Christopher Knight, owner of the biggest article submission site, EzineArticles, tells me that the number of article submissions to his site increased by a staggering 600% from 2004 to 2005. In 2004, EzineArticles was averaging only 1416 article submissions per month. In 2005, it was averaging 8482 article submissions per month! Similarly, at the end of 2005, when I spoke with Mel Strocen, owner of GoArticles, he reported a doubling of article submissions in the second half of the year. "In the last 6 months article submissions have increased by 100%, going from about 1,000 submissions per week to 2,000+ per week," he said.
Jason Lynch, owner of ArticleBlast, reported similar increases; between April '05 and January '06, submissions to ArticleBlast increased by over 300%. The web traffïc to these sites tells the same story. According to Alexa statistics, at the end of 2004, EzineArticles had a reach of approx 100 users per million Internet users per day. Just over a year later, the site is reaching over ten times that many Internet users. (If we take the total number of Internet users worldwide to be 964 million, EzineArticles traffïc has increased from around 96,000 per day to over 1 million visitors per day.) Alexa stats for GoArticles report similar increases in traffïc. At the end of 2004, it had a reach of approx 50 users per million Internet users per day. Just over a year later, it's reaching approx 10 times that number of users. (Again assuming 964 million Internet users worldwide, GoArticles traffïc has increased from around 48,000 per day to around half a million visitors per day.) Figures for ArticleBlast are more difficult to ascertain as the site is younger and has lower overall traffïc. Even if Alexa's figures are a little inflated (as I think they tend to be), they still provide a consistent measure for the period. As such, the percentage increases should be relatively accurate. The Side-Effects of the Rise of Article PR A number of writers have voiced the fear that article PR will die through 'over-use', just as keyword stuffing and link farms died. But I don't agree. Why? Because article PR isn't just useful to authors and SEO copywriters. The success of article PR is based on the premise that our articles are also useful to READERS. So long as the majority of articles remain useful ( i.e. helpful, informative, and easy to read), readers will still want to read them, publishers will still want to publish them, and article PR will remain a viable link building method.
This is true no matter how many people are writing and publishing frëe reprint articles. Frequent use of a tool doesn't make the tool ineffective. (Just look at traditional forms of advertising - millïons of businesses engage in radio, print, and TV advertising, and those methods remain very effective. The fierce competition simply encourages advertisers to improve the quality of their ads in order to stand out.) No, in my opinion, there's no such thing as too many articles. However, there is such a thing as too many BAD articles. Readers want helpful, credible information; they don't want badly written articles or empty words ('article sp@m') which simply carry a link.
Just as importantly, webmasters don't want to spend hours trying to find the right article to publish. At the moment, there are literally hundreds of article submission sites out there. Most of them are generic, fully automated affairs that involve no human moderation. They don't distinguish between good writing and bad, they don't cull article sp@m, and they don't categorize their articles very well. As a result, publishers have to wade through a sea of poor quality to find a handful of useful articles. These issues are the real hurdles that need to be overcome if article PR is to survive. Overcoming the Problems The article submission sites will overcome the problems. Here's how... As mentioned above, readers aren't interested in bad articles or article sp@m. This means that, in the long run, there's no real value in publishing such articles (either for webmasters or article submission sites); readers will frequent the sites that publish useful articles and ignore those that don't. Likewise, publishers will frequent the article submission sites that post useful, easy-to-find articles and ignore those that don't. This means we'll see an increase in the number of human-moderated article submission sites. And once this happens, the article PR landscape will change forever:
1) Human moderated article submission sites will offer a higher percentage of quality articles, and those articles will be easier to find; All in all, it's a positive outlook for authors and publishers of quality articles. Happy writing, publishing, and posting!
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ *Check this out: BlogBlaster Resell at full price - Blast Unlimited Ads to 100 blogs at once unlimited times - Choose your own keywords February 25 Refreshing and Cleansing Radish SaladInspired by The Great American Detox Diet, by Alex Jamieson (Rodale Press, 2005).
This cookbook author’s filmmaker fiance (of Supersize Me fame) suffered terrible ill effects from eating fast food for a month, so she devised this and other recipes to detoxify his system and bring him back to fitness.
INGREDIENTS
2 cups peeled and thinly sliced daikon radishes 1. Combine daikon, apple, carrot, onion, and red radish in a large mixing bowl.
2. In a small mixing bowl, whisk together the orange juice, rice syrup, lime juice, and salt.
3. Pour the liquid over the vegetables and toss well to combine. Garnish with mint and cilantro, if desired, and serve.
Serves 4 to 6. ============================ *Feel free to leave recipes of your own if you like! Get tons more free at Coodoz.com-your everything site. Advertising like its 1999By Mark Daoust
Some may be tempted to say that marketing has become easier in today's Internet. We know more about user's expectations and are able to better target our ads to users who are interested in our websites. Through programs such as Google Adsense and Yahoo's Contextual Marketing programs, we can be relatively certain that the clicks for which we pay are from people who are actually interested in our programs (of course there are issues of click fraud, but that is not the focus of this article). But because our advertising choices have been effectively slimmed down to just a few major ad networks, finding a great deal in advertising has become much harder. Every website owner is rushing to the major ad networks which creates a scarcity of ad spots. The result is that ad prices are being driven up - and your profïts are being driven down. After a little research, however, I learned that the small, upstart, great value advertising options had not died. It gave me hope that the good things of the early Internet could still be alive in today's webbed world. Advertising on Blogs Blogs are big. There is no doubt about it everyone is starting a blog. My wife even started a blog last month ( http://www.thelazywife.com please excuse the shameless promotion of her blog) with the hope of making a little side income. Blogs are relatively easy to setup and maintain, and with so many people talking about blogging successes, they have become an attractive option for those looking to bring in an additional income. This is good for advertisers. The blogging boom has created a buyers market for advertising. Most bloggers are trying to make monëy from contextual advertising and are seeing some levels of success, but most would like to see more monëy from their blogs. The result for the rest of us is that buying ads on blogs can bring quite a bit of traffïc without having to pay a great deal of monëy. If you need proof of this, just head on over to BlogAds. BlogAds is an invitation-only network of blogs offering advertising on their websites. Each site is categorized which allows advertisers to target their ads. The best feature of BlogAds, however, is the ability to not only see the site that you will be advertising on, but also the ability to see the site itself as well as how much estimated traffïc that site will receive while your ad is live. Some of the prices are more expensive, but if you choose wisely and create a decent ad, seeing an effective clickthrough cost of $0.05 to $0.10 is attainable. For my wife's blog we purchased several ads across a handful of targeted blogs. Currently we are on pace to seeing an effective clickthrough rate of about $0.05/click. That is effective advertising. There are other blog ad networks besides BlogAds, and many blog owners would be happy to accept an advertiser if you were to approach them. The traffïc on blogs is real, and with the number and popularity of blogs, finding a good advertising deal is not too difficult. Finding Upstart Ad Networks One of the beautiful things about the late 1990's was the sheer volume of upstart ad agencies. Although none of these groups were able to generate the traffïc that any of the mega agencies of today are able to generate, these upstarts usually were able to provide solid traffïc for a true bargain in an attempt to woo new advertisers. Upstart ad networks, although a lot less visible today than they once were, can be found in a multitude of ways. They usually do not have a lot of press around them, and they probably have only a few quality websites in their network, but they do exist and they can be a good advertising outlet. More and more these networks are focusing on vertical markets (such as an ad network that deals only with Internet marketing). To find a network like this, you should familiarize yourself with the major websites in your industry. Pay attention to who is serving their advertising (you can usually figure this out by viewing the source of the page) and chëck the rates of advertising. Most of the time you will find a major ad network behind the ad, but from time to time you can find an absolute steal. New Search Networks With Google Adsense, Yahoo Marketing, and the upcoming MSN Ad Center (in Beta), it would be reasonable to assume that search engine marketing has turned into a virtual oligopoly. Thankfully, this is not the case. Not only are there new types of search engines being formed that will undoubtedly challenge search as we know it, there are traditional search networks that offer legitïmate advertising options. The ISEDN (Independent Search Engine & Directory Network) is a group of smaller search engines and directories that have banded together to offer advertisers an alternative to the more expensive search engine options. Although the traffïc of the current 165+ search engines that make up the ISEDN is not at the level of the major search networks, the group still boasts a fairly impressive search volume of over 150 million monthly searches. Most people would avoid advertising on a small search engine like many of the ones found in the ISEDN because off the lack of search volume as well as the question of whether the vendors are offering legitïmate traffïc. However, as a group, the ISEDN is able to leverage their traffïc, remove the incentive of offering bad traffïc by offering their ads for a flat fee ($4/keyword/month minimum 3 months), and offer an ad product that can theoretically reduce an advertiser's cost to an insignificant level. This may be one of the reasons that the network sees the majority of its advertisers renew after the first three months. In addition to search networks like the ISEDN, alternatives to search engines are starting to gain steam. Websites such as Digg.com, Del.icio.us, and Wikipedia are changing the way we find information on the Internet. While these are not a pure replacement for search engines, they are becoming a very popular way to find new websites. Most of these new social network websites do not currently offer advertising, but these could provide a very good alternative to the major search networks in the near future. Be Crazy - Relive 1999 The web has certainly changed, and maybe nothing has changed more than the way we advertise. The days are gone when establishing a successful website was an easy task. Paid advertising can be a quick shortcut to launching your website. Many website owners avoid paid advertising because it is usually expensive, and seeing a real return on the investmënt can be tricky. But if you look around, be creative, and keep an open mind, there are plenty of bargain advertisements that can bring quality traffïc to your website.
========================================================
Don't forget to post your links & comments. Also please visit ContentCity February 20 This one is an awesome freebieClick it and post the crap out of your blogs with free linkbacks & all.
Enjoy, my friends & don't forget you can post free here too!! February 15 The Dark Side Of Google The way that search marketers dream up conspiracy theories you'd think that we're all paranoid with nothing better to do.
Is there a true reason for concern? I think not, but reading other peoples paranoia is always entertaining. We all know search engines are "out to get webmasters". They have nothing better to do than to think of new ways that will infringe on websites rankings or play hide and seek with site PageRank. Google is at the forefront of the theorists' attention. And it's not very hard to see why. It's Tough Being At The Top Google's market share is certainly growing. It handled 60 percent of Internet search queries in November 2005, up from 47 percent a year earlier, according to ComScore Networks. Google's chief officers have expressed that they are committed to growing the company itself in a sustainable way. Quoting CFO George Reyes: "Google would be spending more on research and development, and will invest heavily in its computing infrastructure." Google's motto "do no evil" has been analyzed and debated so many times. Forum posts and articles are always met with "Google does this" or "Google does that", the fact of the matter is that none of us know "what Google's intentions are, except Google themselves of course...but it's still nice to enter the guessing game to see exactly "how close, or far off" you are from the materialization. Enter the Conspiracies Everyone has their opinion on the matter - which makes for entertaining reading at least. Jagger Update The conspiracy: Google is out to destroy all the organic listings so that everyone will move over to PPC. The real deal: Google updates their algorithm from time to time to help make search results more relevant. Each update usually receives a name by the SEO community - somewhat like naming hurricanes. The most recent update was called "Jagger". Many scraper directory sites and sites that bought those links were removed from the update. If you had made use of any shädy techniques it is most likely that your site was caught in Jagger. It was quite a harsh update if you had not employed solid SEO techniques. So needless to say there are a lot of angry webmasters out there. A good example is the German BMW site (bmw.de) which was recently removed for making use of sp@m techniques. Just goes to show SEO is SEO no matter what the language. Google Adsense The conspiracy: Google Adsense sites get priority in rankings so that Google can make more monëy. And also Google is trying to take dominance and force webmasters to use Adsense rather than outbound links (link building). The real deal: If this were true, regardless of how hard Google was to "try", they couldn't force a greater number of people to Adwords through preventing the achievement of a favorable ranking. Besides, when Adwords first was released, several SEO's tested this theory buy purchasing paid listings over varied lengths in time. The results? There was absolutely no correlation between purchasing an Adwords account and your organic search ranking. IP Recording / Privacy Infringement The conspiracy: Search engines log IP addresses. The data collected can be used against you. The real deal: There have been many theories that Google logs searchers' IP addresses etc., to track their search behaviour, but the situation has gotten much biggër than that. With all the hype stemming from the Department of Justice requesting logs from the Big Shots of search to see what searches were conducted, the talk has shifted to legal implications should the court find in favour of government. Every bit of network traffïc you use is marked with your IP address; it can be used to link all of those disparate transactions together. Filtering Results The conspiracy: If Google can filter the results for China, what stops them from filtering the rest of world? The real deal: Well this is still very much a hot topic at the moment and I have not really made up my mind on this one quite yet. I can only refer to the Google "Human Rights Caucus Briefing" in their Blog. Excerpt from blog: "In deciding how best to approach the Chinese - or any - market, we must balance our commitments to satisfy the interests of users, expand access to information, and respond to local conditions. Our strategy for doing business in China seeks to achieve that balance through improved disclosure, targeting of services, and local investment." And "In order to operate Google.cn as a website in China, Google is required to remove some sensitive information from our search results. These restrictions are imposed by Chinese laws, regulatïons, and policies. However, when we remove content from Google.cn, we disclose that fact to our users."
This is nothing new; in fact Google has altered their search results to comply with local laws in France, Germany, and the United States previously. Also, is it not better to have censored information than none at all? At least this way Google has a starting point from which to fight the censorship. Do No Evil According to Larry Page: "Google's goal is to provide a much higher level of service to all those who seek information, whether they're at a desk in Boston, driving through Bonn, or strolling in Bangkok." The Google philosophy: Excerpt from site: Full-disclosure update: When we first wrote these "10 things" four years ago, we included the phrase "Google does not do horoscopes, financial advice or chat." Over time we've expanded our view of the range of services we can offer -- web search, for instance, isn't the only way for people to access or use information - and products that then seemed unlikely are nöw key aspects of our portfolio. This doesn't mean we've changed our core mission; just that the farther we travel toward achieving it, the more those blurry objects on the horizon come into sharper focus (to be replaced, of course, by more blurry objects). Some psychologists say that the closer one becomes to a person (or something) the harder it is to see the good stuff. Has Google become so intertwined in our daily lives that we no longer recognize the good stuff that it has brought us? Let me remind you of a few: 1. Relevant Search Results: A source to find information faster. Every update gets rid of the "clutter". 2. Gmail: As far as frëe web based email goes, this must be the most user-friendly with the largest amount of storage space to boot. You can also tie in any other email accounts you may hold and use Google's interface as the "one stop shop" so to speak. 3. Gtalk: Google's frëe IM and Voice Chat service. Nöw also tying in with your Gmail interface. This means that it's accessible from wherever you have internet - you don't need to have the program installed on the machine that you're working from. 4. Leader of other SE: There is no doubt that Google is at the forefront of "great new ideas" for search engines. Google leads and the rest follow. One example is Gmail - more storage space for frëe. Yahoo! was soon to follow with a similarly sized email account for Yahoo! Mail users at no cost. MSN, however, charges for an increased mailbox. 5. Google Earth: Geographic information at your fingertips. Get driving directions and location information for just about anywhere on the globe, and because they use satellite imagery intertwined with maps you get a pretty good idea of what any place looks like. 6. Google Video: A selection of homemade clips, TV shows, movies and viral clips *freely available on the net. (*some TV shows and movies need to be purchased of course) 7. Google Alerts: Need to know when someone has mentioned you, your company or any topic of interest to you on their website? With Google Alerts you are notified *as it happens. (*as Google spiders that site) These are only but a few things that Google has brought into our lives so to speak. So ask yourself again - is there really any concern for their progress, or are we benefiting from it at the end of the day? Forget About It It's a typical situation where a good company gets too big and people start getting a little uncomfortable about its dominance in society. So I say forget about all the clutter and focus on the good stuff of which 2006 will bring many new innovations and a whole bunch of new conspiracy theories no doubt.
============================== *Article taken from SiteProNews.com February 08 VI is listed at HitFarmVisitorInvasion is listed at the HitFarm for its high-traffic blast of
24hour [traffic] service. FREE to join, no upgrade fee just auto surf for daily bonuses. Purchase credits if you want, see your sites too so you know they're working. If not you can correct so you're not wasting hits. Join VI and the HitFarm. VI sends cash once a month for all new members who sign up under you [if your account is upgraded]. Shannon always pays instantly, fast and answers all emails. Upgrade at VI gets you a higher cash return plus bonuses.
*Published By Richard Lukenbach (http://www.thehitfarm.com/index.php?ref=912) February 07 When Blogs Become Too SuccessfulWhen Blogs Become Too Successful
Well-known blogger and Yahoo staffer Russell Beattie found the demands of multiple channels of information so demanding that he has turned off comments in his blog, along with deleting hundreds of existing comments. Is it a blog without comments? Beattie thinks so, and called his decision to shut down commenting a return "to old-school blogging." While the vast majority of bloggers get a limited number of comments, if any, Beattie was an exception. His site represented the views of someone who, like noted blogger Jeremy Zawodny, worked inside one of the big Internet powers, but spoke with his voice and not the company's. That drew interest and commentary. So much that Beattie has packed in the comment functionality, and cited reasons why: Comments were taking up too much time to manage, and too many mental cycles as I processed them in addition to emails, IMs, SMS, Phone Calls, etc. I've gotten over 680 comments since Jan. 1st. That's an average of 20 a day - though sometimes many more - and I get at least 2 or 3 anonymous idiots per post as well, and the occasional spammer. Dealing with the comments takes time, and considering that I'm disorganized already, it's something that needed to be cut. For some reason, Beattie went a step beyond turning off comments. He deleted all the existing commentary on all of his blog entries. "All of the old ones, and no more new ones. All gone bye bye, he said. Trashing those old comments could be problematic, as the Mobile Jones blog pointed out: Did it occur to Russ that over the few years that others have been contributing to his blog that they might have linked to that content which no longer exists? I wonder how many broken links and therefore broken context to posts on other blogs have resulted from this innvocation (sic) of the delete key. Bummer for that group. Bummer for those conversations. Likewise, BBC Backstage developer Ben Metcalfe indicated why it would be more desirable to leave a comment on a blog rather than creating a post on one's own blog to link to Beattie's, the model he suggests going forward: Sure, you can ‘comment' on a blog post by writing your own blog post - but not everyone has a blog. And those who do often have ‘themed' blogs where a certain level of on-topicness needs to be maintained. Can a blog be too successful? For one person with interests and work responsibilities beyond the blog, certainly. Beattie makes a good point on the multitude of ways people can be on the receiving end of information. But going back to the question of what makes a blog, comments seem to be the deciding factor. Taking them off a blog turns it into something that looks like it belongs on a different Yahoo service altogether. Maybe Beattie will rethink the topic in the future. Perhaps he could adopt the Gawker model of only permitting comments by invitation only. That would eliminate issues like comment spam and other anonymous posting hijinks. Now the question is, which of the more popular blog owners, well-established in PageRank, decides to follow Beattie's example next? --- You Have Only 4 Second's To Capture Your Prospect's InterestYou Have Only 4 Second's To Capture Your Prospect's Interest. By Martin Boyd Four second's is all you you've got... Maximum. Often, It's just Pick up any newspaper or magazine. Now start glancing thru Now think! How long did it take you to find that particular article? How many articles did you skip that did not interest you? Now think further.... Why did you stop at that particular The only reason you stopped at that article was because... The HEADLINE caught your attention. Even if other articles could have interested you, you did not If you fail to capture your customer's or prospects attention A powerful, compelling, attention grabbing headline is the ================================================ February 06 Are Spam Filters Ruining Your Business?How 'Default' Optioned Spam and Junk Email Filters Could Be Ruining
Your Business by Suzzi Law You spent tireless hours creating your business model, even longer perfecting your website to be the best that it can be. Taking count of your competitors, positioning yourself with a uniqueness that surely could not see you fail. You agonized for weeks over the perfect website hosting company for your business, and chose the one that guaranteed you 99% uptime (you want your website 'up'!). You have staff in place, or indeed if working alone, know that you will be your own 'one-woman' customer support team. You have made an executive decision, through the hundreds of business meetings that you have had with yourself (in your own head - whilst falling asleep, in the bath and eating lunch) that you will be providing email sales and email customer support only. After all, if it is good enough for eBay then it is good enough for you yes. Everything is in place, the site is live, the search engine marketing firm has been contracted for $39.95 a month (you don't have much of a budget just yet), the advertising is in place and you have decided to do this yourself to save extra money (after all you summarize, why hire a company to look after PPC when you can easily do it yourself right). It's Monday, the perfect 'go-live' day, 1500 hours and the site has been live 8 hours, your pride and joy is up and running and your dream of making an online business a reality is now yours. You are getting visitors and hey, you are even starting to get sales and it's all looking good. You have employed some of the best anti spam/junk mail filter software there is to avoid unwanted distractions whilst you respond to your new customers and your website hosting company also guarantees you the most vigorous defence at server level for unwanted email. But...suddenly there is a problem, you start receiving emails complaining that you have not replied to other emails, which you had never received. At first you simply thought it was a 'crazy' customer or one of those lost emails that never get there that you know the traditional postal service are so well known for. But...then there are 2 emails complaining of non-response, one from a customer who had bought from you the previous day demanding that if you do not respond immediately that they will charge-back the transaction! Where did that come from, you never received an email but you did receive this email - why was that, this really is coming more of a regular occurrence and something that you need to take action in resolving. Now, not only are you losing sales by not receiving emails of a pre-sales nature but you are receiving emails from your customers complaining that once they buy from you that you cannot be contacted. And so it starts, the beginning of the end, a bad reputation for customer support, charged-back transactions that cost you and your now struggling website business additional money and a realization that there seems to be a problem with email, but you do not know what it is. Ok, so the above might seem a little extreme but we live in an extreme world where just one issue can make or break a company and as a small 'one-woman' online business who has spent so much money on search engine marketing, advertising and making your website the best that it can be, you really could do without such issues. You want to be a success, not gain a reputation as one whom provides terrible service. Where do you look to resolve the issue? No further than the spam/junk mail filter software you purchased and/or the service mail filters that your website hosting company put in place 'for your protection'. The very purpose for which spam/junk mail filters are implemented, being to protect your mailbox from unwanted email, can be the very same good intentions that cause you great issues with your customers and cause annoyance to distraction in resolution. What is an unwanted email; yes the hundreds of spam emails selling the latest pharmaceutical product from yet another untrained and un-web-educated affiliate. Emails that you never asked for or indeed want - they are so annoying that you ensured that your home PC, which is also used by your 2 kids (12 and 15 years of age) employs the same level of spam email protection as your business PC. You didn't want your kids to become privy to 'adult' spam themed emails that pop through every mail box from uncaring spammers across the world did you. But wait, this is your business computer and your business website we are talking about now, not your home PC where spam and junk email filters are best put to use. Your business uses email as its main communication tool, is it really a wise idea to put your faith in a piece of software or your website hosting companies default mail filters. Should you not really take on the ownership of deciding what is and what is not junk email, and the question to really ask oneself is, can your website business really afford to put the decision of what should and what should not arrive in your email box. Regardless of how 'intelligent' the spam filter is, how much control you have over it, or indeed how much control you do not have over it if a default feature of your website hosting email accounts, any website business worth its salt needs at the very least to consider all of the factors that make up this fundamental business decision - to filter, or not to filter. Have you run all appropriate tests? Can you receive emails from Hotmail, Yahoo and other free web accounts? What happens if an attachment comes with the email, and are there any kind of content filters or 'auto-responder' issues to think about. What about the different ISP's, can you receive from AOL users - or more importantly sometimes, can AOL users receive your emails. Explore the next set of issues, perhaps you can receive all emails, but what happens if your customer is using s spam/junk email filter and they cannot receive your reply. The nightmare scenario then of you actually responding to your customers contact emails but because of their ISP or junk mail filter they cannot receive your replies, have you tested this, have you tested the content of your emails? If you lace HTML or URL's within the content is that accepted...yes these are all issues that you should have considered before your website even went live but this is not a well documented or well discussed topic. Yet, this should a subject of conversation, it should be a topic of interest and it certainly should be something that is addressed as part of every website implementation plan. Do not let a spam or junk email filter ruin your business. Get it setup properly, with thorough implementation and gain knowledge of how to operate it correctly. Don't let technology take over by simply selecting the 'default' option. This article was produced by http://www.servicewrap.net. Search engine ranking and marketing service provider - without real visitors it will not matter if you have email communication issues. NOTE: Not all website hosting companies implement anti-spam filters by default. If in doubt, ask. This article does not assume that spam/junk email filters will ruin a business, only that the business in question should be thoroughly knowledgeable of any issues when running such software - and where implementation and spam control is available that these are properly set up. Copyright © 2005 Suzzi Law Service Wrap ----------------------------------------------------------------- Suzzi Law is the quality and control marketing arm of http://www.servicewrap.net, with many years experience in undertaking search engine ranking services for hundreds of companies worldwide. Database MarketingDatabase Marketing is the gathering and storing of specific information February 03 Informative Article on Analyzing Your WebTraffic===================================================
Analyzing Website Traffic =================================================== Analyzing your web traffic statistics can be an invaluable
tool for a number of different reasons. But before you can make full use of this tool, you need to understand how to interpret the data. Most web hosting companies will provide you with basic web
traffic information that you then have to interpret and make pertinent use of. However, the data you receive from your host company can be overwhelming if you don't understand how to apply it to your particular business and website. Let's start by examining the most basic data - the average visitors to your site on a daily, weekly, and monthly basis. These figures are the most accurate measure of your
website's activity. It would appear on the surface that the more traffic you see recorded, the better you can assume your website is doing, but this is an inaccurate perception. You must also look at the behavior of your visitors once they come to your website to accurately gauge the effectiveness of your site. There is often a great misconception about what is commonly
known as "hits" and what is really effective, quality traffic to your site. Hits simply means the number of information requests received by the server. If you think about the fact that a hit can simply equate to the number of graphics per page, you will get an idea of how overblown the concept of hits can be. For example, if your homepage has 15 graphics on it, the server records this as 15 hits, when in reality we are talking about a single visitor checking out a single page on your site. As you can see, hits are not useful in analyzing your website traffic. The more visitors that come to your website, the more
accurate your interpretation will become. The greater the traffic is to your website, the more precise your analysis will be of overall trends in visitor behavior. The smaller the number of visitors, the more a few anomalous visitors can distort the analysis. The aim is to use the web traffic statistics to figure out
how well or how poorly your site is working for your visitors. One way to determine this is to find out how long on average your visitors spend on your site. If the time spent is relatively brief, it usually indicates an underlying problem. Then the challenge is to figure out what that problem is. It could be that your keywords are directing the wrong type
of visitors to your website, or that your graphics are confusing or intimidating, causing the visitor to exit rapidly. Use the knowledge of how much time visitors are spending on your site to pinpoint specific problems, and after you fix those problems, continue to use time spent as a gauge of how effective your fix has been. Additionally, web traffic stats can help you determine
effective and ineffective areas of your website. If you have a page that you believe is important, but visitors are exiting it rapidly, that page needs attention. You could, for example, consider improving the link to this page by making the link more noticeable and enticing, or you could improve the look of the page or the ease that your visitors can access the necessary information on that page. If, on the other hand, you notice that visitors are
spending a lot of time on pages that you think are less important, you might consider moving some of your sales copy and marketing focus to that particular page. As you can see, these statistics will reveal vital
information about the effectiveness of individual pages, and visitor habits and motivation. This is essential information to any successful Internet marketing campaign. Your website undoubtedly has exit pages, such as a final
order or contact form. This is a page you can expect your visitor to exit rapidly. However, not every visitor to your site is going to find exactly what he or she is looking for, so statistics may show you a number of different exit pages. This is normal unless you notice a exit trend on a particular page that is not intended as an exit page. In the case that a significant percentage of visitors are exiting your website on a page not designed for that purpose, you must closely examine that particular page to discern what the problem is. Once you pinpoint potential weaknesses on that page, minor modifications in content or graphic may have a significant impact on the keeping visitors moving through your site instead of exiting at the wrong page. After you have analyzed your visitor statistics, it's time
to turn to your keywords and phrases. Notice if particular keywords are directing a specific type of visitor to your site. The more targeted the visitor - meaning that they find what they are looking for on your site, and even better, fill out your contact form or make a purchase - the more valuable that keyword is. However, if you find a large number of visitors are being
directed - or should I say misdirected - to your site by a particular keyword or phrase, that keyword demands adjustment. Keywords are vital to bringing quality visitors to your site who are ready to do business with you. Close analysis of the keywords your visitors are using to find your site will give you a vital understanding of your visitor's needs and motivations. Finally, if you notice that users are finding your website
by typing in your company name, break open the champagne! It means you have achieved a significant level of brand recognition, and this is a sure sign of burgeoning success. =====================================
*This article taken from MadameVanessa's Blog. Click here and sign in for more information. February 01 Site LinkingLink your sites to other sites. Reciprocal linking is one of the most
highly effective means of raising one's site ranking and bringing
targeted visitors to your sites. There are many ways to do this. More
free ways than you can imagine.
You may want to start with FFAs simply for the free linkage. The
chances of making a sale or referral are quite slim UNLESS you are
promoting Your Own Personal FFA via FFA. If you do this, make sure
the FFA that you are using allows you to edit your email signature
for the confirmation mail that will be sent to each poster on your FFA.
When editing your signature, be sure to add the links to your main
pages below your name. Openers of confirmation mails will see your
signature and links. If they are of use to the reader, you just sent a
spam-free email ad and raised your link popularity at the same time.
Blogs!!! Post to any blogs that allow it. Submit articles and use your
#1 link in reference with your signature. Post to blogs that actually
allow advertising (this one does). Choose blogs that have similar
content for direct advertising, choose blogs with various content for
indirect advertising via article sharing.
Are you a forum-hopper? Then you already know to add your links
to your signature in forums as well. You may also want to search
forums for offers of free reciprocal linking from webmasters that are
not in your immediate circle of friends and contacts. Spread out!
Classified websites are very good to link to. Classifieds hold various
content of many types and are also quite likely to be crawled by the
search engines. Strategically place and target your classified ads.
Look for a place to actually advertise on their site besides just posting
your advertisements.
Are you a reseller? Did you know that many reseller affiliate programs
promote your link in exchange for you promoting their links for
commissions? If you are already copy/pasting codes to your pages
to promote for commissions, then this method is for you.
Many traffic exchanges allow site linking or textlink impressions in
the surfbar. You may think this method is not effective, but its the
clicks and engine crawls that raise your link ranking.
Feel free to leave any permanent links pertaining to these subject.
Your input, comments, feedback, articles and links are welcome
here.
Please feel free to contact me to link to my plugin site: www.shannonsjobops.bravehost.com Creative & Profitable Ways to Use Autoresponders===================================================
Creative and Profitable Ways to Use Autoreponders =================================================== An interested visitor who has been strolling through your
site has finally come to just what she is looking for and is about to make a purchase. It's a sunny afternoon, and her cat, who happens to be sitting on the moss under the visitor's large fifty-year-old snow-rose bonsai tree, suddenly jumps down, and the priceless tree topples over. In the blink of an eye, your visitor exits your site, and
your sale is dust - unless you have had the foresight to utilize an autoresponder that has captured her email address. If you have installed an autoresponder, you can then follow-up with her, and in all probability, make the sale when the poor woman has finished repotting her precious bonsai. Autoresponders are remarkable, versatile programs that do
so much more than just automatically answer your email. Here are a few ideas that will help you to creatively and productively use your autoresponder to transform the casual visitor into a profitable customer. Use your autoresponder to: 1. Publish a newsletter. Certain quality autoresponders
will manage subscriptions and follow-up with interested prospects. Your newsletter can keep your visitors informed about your services or products, while building your reputation as a credible expert in your particular business. 2. Publish a newsletter only for your affiliates. Inform
them of current sales you are running and of promotional material that your affiliates can use themselves to increase their commissions. Include tips, advice, and techniques that your affiliates can use to successfully go out and promote your business. 3. Write reviews. Cover books, software, music, e-books,
movies, etc., and put each review in an autoresponder. Review your affiliate programs, using a link to your affiliate's page in your autoresponder. 4. Distribute your articles. Writing and distributing
targeted articles is a powerful tool to build your business credibility, bring traffic to your site, and increase your sales potential. If your articles contain valuable information, many editors will print what is known as a resource box for you. A resource box contains your bio and a brief description of your service or product. It can also contain your autoresponder address. Let's say you've written fifty articles. Put them on separate autoresponder accounts and create a master list that contains the titles of each article, the autoresponder address, and a brief abstract. Then promote your master list. Additionally, include your publishing guidelines so your affiliates can add their articles to your list, increasing the number of writers who are represented in your article list. 5. Create mailing lists. Inform subscribers to your
articles when you've written new ones that they may want to publish in their own newsletter or website. 6. Automate your sales process. Use an ad to insure
repeated exposure of your message, which has been proven to effectively increase sales. In your ad, put your autoresponder address where a visitor will be exposed to numerous marketing materials. This multiplies the chances of converting visitors into customers. For example, if you're selling a particular product, put testimonials about how spectacular it is on your autoresponder, and add a detailed, enticing description of your product. 7. Distribute advertising. Let's say you sell advertising
on your website or in your newsletter or e-zine. Set your autoresponder to send the information about rates and how to place an ad automatically to all prospects' email addresses. Then have your autoresponder follow-up. It can also send notification of any special deals you are currently offering. 8. Distribute an email course. Each day, have your
autoresponder send out another lesson. Just be sure that each lesson has quality content - not a sales pitch. Your content will do the selling for you, and will do it much more effectively. You can include tips centered on a different topic for each lesson, illustrating how your product will benefit the reader. Include the tangible benefits the visitor will reap by purchasing your product. Make sure to include a paragraph or two at the end of each lesson enticing your prospect to consider making a purchase. 9. Automate a reminder about your service or product after
a visitor has completed your course. This will increase the possibility of sales from visitors who have taken your course but are dragging their feet about actually making a purchase. You can also use these reminders to promote new products or services, and the products and services of your affiliate programs. 10. Distribute free reports. This gives your visitor an
idea of the type of information you can provide and the quality of your product or service. Make sure these reports are not sales letters or you will more than likely lose a potential customer than gain a sale. 11. Create trivia quizzes on your site and place the
answers in an autoresponder. Your visitor will then be motivated to request your autoresponder, and you will have a record of the visitors' email addresses who took your quiz. Or create a contest and have any visitors that enter send their responses to your autoresponder. Your autoresponder can be set-up to send them a confirmation of their entry. 12. Offer a trial version of your product. Give your
prospects a sample of your ebook, course, software, membership, etc. People who are exposed to a little taste often end up wanting the whole pie. You can also capture their email addresses when you offer them a free trial from your website. Set up your autoresponder to give instructions on how to obtain their free trial, and then make sure to follow-up to try and close the sale. 13. Link to hidden pages on your autoresponder. For
example, a hidden page could be your affiliate page that contains graphics, promotional articles, and text links that interested affiliates can make use of. Inform visitors that they may have free access to your affiliate page by simply requesting your autoresponder. You will then gather a list of visitors who may be interested in becoming your affiliates. 14. Use an autoresponder on your order page. Post a request
form for visitors to be notified of special offers or discounts in the future. This creates a very effective mailing list that contains the names of people who are already your customers. 15. Put your links page on your autoresponder. It should
contain up to fifty links that would be of particular interest to your visitors. Make sure to add your own promotional copy at the top or bottom of this page. Now that you have proof that autoresponders can be used creatively, see if you can come up with some brilliant ideas of your own! Blogging for SalesBlogs may not be for you, as they take a good amount of time to build, maintain and fill
with informative, interesting content. If you don't have the time or are simply not willing to commit the time to the task, you will be missing out on very effective traffic for your business(es). Here are a few hints to get you off to a good start on your blog:
*Blogs are an informal means of internet communication, there is no need to blow technobabble
at your readers. *Don't be overly wordy, short, sweet and and easy read will help prevent your readers from giving up midway through your article. *Keep your readers coming back for more. Commit to posting often, not necessarily daily or weekly, but at least monthly. Timid about writing and posting articles? Don't be. No one is perfect. Keep these few, simple things in mind: *If you cannot put your good word on a product or company, don't promote it until you know one way or the other if it is legitimate and working. *Don't talk in circles and leave too much at question for your readers. The more direct you are, the more likely you are to hold your reader's interest. *As mentioned before, technobabble is not needed but you should at least check spelling and context before publishing to your blog. *Be friendly, your blog is not a term paper. Be informative yet write it as you would if your reader were sitting across from you sharing a pot of coffee. *Feel free to use articles written by others. Always get permission and always give the original writer the by-line. *Many major companies hire professional writers to create articles for them or to maintain their blogs entirely. If you are more comfortable with this, go for it. This is a totally ethical means of blogging. Uploading photos is a fine way of making your blog more personal if that is the feel you are
going for. Many marketers believe in self-branding. If you are comfortable with your own phote on your blog, then go right ahead and brand. If not, post photos and artwork that pertain to the content of your entire blog, not just your business. Readers can click the link you have to your website(s) to get that. Having various kinds of content in your photos is equally as important as having various types of content in your articles. *You may use this post in your blogs, ezines, newsletters, etc. as long as you post that is is by Shannon Whitehead of www.shannonsjobops.bravehost.com January 29 New for Webmasters OnlyAttention Webmasters!
We have got just the thing for you to not only improve
your membership base, but to increase your income!!
You sell advertising, why not do it in a united form?
Have a looksee, you won't be sorry!
|
|
|